Agnostics aren't really agnostic. We know the unknowable only remains unknowable until it's known. Or not. We're not theists who claim to know things others cannot verify. And we're not a-theists who similarly claim to know things that others cannot verify or at least absolutely exclude. Both claim verification isn't necessary to hold their belief. But they are beliefs without proof. Which leaves the agnostic wandering about with a headache most of the time from listening to the two sides of the coin war over the currently unprovable. Exploration is more interesting and beneficial. The biology of our senses, the manifestation of our consciousness from that biology, and the much larger spaces of all that exists in-between those capabilities and limitations; this is not agnosticism, theology nor atheism, but rather a realization of our bodily selves that binds these concepts each as a small subset of far greater reasonable possibilities and potentials. It is my intention to document this subjective and occasionally objective exploration, always within reason.